Track crawl rate and index rate by URL pattern, category, or any custom URL set. It helps you find where the real issue is hiding instead of relying on site-level summaries alone.
Search Console can show the big picture, but it is harder to monitor which specific URL groups or categories are falling behind over time.
You want to know which categories have high non-index rates, how sitemap groups changed after a fix, or where the problem is concentrated.
Grouping URLs, aggregating patterns, and repeating the same checks over time often turns into manual spreadsheet work.
Too coarse site-wide summaries
Manual work category aggregation
Hard to sustain before/after tracking
Define the monitoring unit that matches your operation, then track crawl rate, index rate, and problem reasons continuously.
Watch crawl and index rates over time for URL groups, categories, or sitemap-based samples.
Use the grouping logic that matches your site structure and operational questions.
Separate problems by non-index reason so you can prioritize actions more clearly.
Catch sudden drops in crawl or index rate before they spread across the site.
Built to support monitoring, investigation, and team communication around index coverage.
Track crawl and index rates for selected URL groups or XML sitemaps on an ongoing basis.
Use sitemap sampling or category-level monitoring depending on your operational need.
Drill into non-crawled or non-indexed page groups using the unit that matters to your team.
It becomes easier to test hypotheses and see where the issue is actually concentrated.
See trend lines and problem groups together in one place so issues are easier to spot and share.
Coverage percentages and trend views help make the situation legible at a glance.
Instead of manually rebuilding coverage views, Index Worker lets you keep the same operational lenses over time.
| Comparison point | With Search Console only | With Index Worker |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Before You can see the big picture, but changing the analysis unit is hard | After Track arbitrary URL sets continuously |
| Depth | Before Category-level reporting often requires manual aggregation | After Organize issues by non-index reason |
| Operational continuity | Before Ongoing before/after monitoring is difficult to sustain | After Turn anomaly detection into a repeatable workflow |
Move time away from manual monitoring and into prioritizing and validating improvements.
Quickly identify which categories or URL groups are deteriorating.
Track whether the target area improves after operational or technical changes.
Monitor meaningful subsets instead of relying only on site-wide summaries.
A stable monitoring unit helps the team maintain a common view of the problem.
We have materials covering implementation examples, functionality, and pricing.
.BwweyAj6_ZJlM9M.webp){kind=logo}